Go Directly To Jail, for such a stupid idea

artists craptastic rendering

Check this out:

"Monopoly set to pass go with Ridley Scott

If you thought that Tetris, the Movie was a bad idea, wait until you hear about this one

If you listened very closely, you might have heard, coming out of the far west, the faint but undeniable sound of the bottom of a barrel being scraped. I refer to the news, reported recently in the film trade press, that Ridley Scott has signed on to direct a big-screen adaptation of Monopoly.

Yes, you read right: Monopoly. The board game. The one that's been around for most of the 20th century, in one form or another (Parker formally acquired the rights in 1935). Scott, we are told, was originally slated only to produce, for Universal Pictures, but now will helm the film as well, and reportedly intends to give it "a futuristic sheen, along the lines of his iconic Blade Runner."

Just what you imagine when you play, isn't it? Golden light filtering through Venetian blinds. A well-fed owl perched in the corner somewhere. And, just as you're about to put some hotels on Park Lane, your brother-in-law leaning in close to mutter, "Time to die." Oh yes, it's all perfectly congruent with that family classic we've loved for generations. Amazing, it hasn't been made into a movie already

...Bad as this is, it's not the worst that could happen. On the contrary: in their unending search for a ready-made audience and a "risk-adverse spend", Hollywood studios are teaming with games manufacturers to produce more adaptations. Before long we may be treated to such kitchen-table classics as Battleship (also from Universal) and Milton Bradley's Game of Life and Ouija Board (which, in fairness, could be kind of cool).

As one producer friend put it, "Hollywood would adapt a parking ticket if they thought people would come to see it" – a statement confirmed back in May of 2003 when Paramount paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to option Avril Lavigne's single Sk8er Boi. The cash, it seems, went mostly to acquire that "youthful" spelling; the film never materialised.

Make no mistake: Blade Runner is a flat-out masterpiece, Scott's best and most satisfying movie. But applying its rococo-futurist aesthetic to a venture whose lead character looks like this, promises a peculiar disjunction of style and subject.

One possible solution may be to shift genres. And in this respect, Monopoly offers no shortage of options.

How about a period piece? Despite Hasbro's rather Stalinist attempts to rewrite history, it now seems clear that one Lizzie Magie, a Quaker living in Maryland, originally conceived the game in 1904. Then called The Landlord's Game, it was intended to warn of the perils of private monopolies, not to celebrate them. Perhaps because of this stern moral rectitude, Quaker board games remain, to this day, something of a niche market.

Scott has form with historical pieces - Gladiator and his 1977 debut, The Duellists, are particularly fine. I can see Amy Adams as an effervescent Lizzie – and Russell Crowe (who these days is to Scott what DiCaprio is to Scorsese) as a pudgy carpetbagger.

What about a war movie? Again, Scott knows the territory, after all. And during the second world war, the British secret service mobilised the International Red Cross to distribute a special Monopoly edition for allied POWs.While one imagines the actual game-play to have been a little on the grim side ("You've just won a beauty contest. Prize: a night with the Hauptbefehlsleiter!"), the adapted game had its uses – not least, to conceal various items (maps, compasses, small amounts of cash) that could aid the soldiers, were they to escape. Though, frankly, to have included a Get Out Of Jail Free card would have just seemed cruel.

It's not that cinema is incompatible with the blithe pleasures of playtime: think of the obscure rules, the elusive clues, of Jacques Rivette's Pont du Nord, which treats the arrondissements of Paris like a giant board game. Or Anthony Harvey's They Might Be Giants, which does much the same for Manhattan. And what is L'Avventura, after all, if not an extended game of hide-and-seek?

Yet this one has a definite whiff about it, somehow. Still, it might conceivably get made, and if it does, will doubtless cost a fortune – neither Scott nor his "futuristic sheen" come cheap. No matter: whatever the budget, they'll spend it the same way: like it's play money."

Which got a friend and I talking about, A) How stupid and ridiculous this is, and B) how on Earth the game pieces will translate to the film, and who will inevitably play them. I submit the following, for your dissection and discussion:
Knowing Scott, it'll all be a mix of either metaphors or ham fisted literality:
  • Wheelbarrow - This will be the sidekick, the guy that does a lot of the leg work for the male lead. His last name will be "Barrow", or "Wagon" or something. Maybe a cop, on the inside. Maybe he ends up betraying the hero. Shia Lebeouf.
  • Battleship - A matron of some sort, a loud and heavyset woman that protects the female lead, or the male lead, or both. Comic Relief, in a Mae West vein. Probably Queen Latifah.
  • Sack of Money - Literally a sack of Money. Some sort of Payoff, or Ransom. The conveyance of which will be an exact replica of the playing piece.
  • A Horse and Rider - Most cars are hover vehicles, like in Blade Runner, so all the ground traffic is pedestrian, therefore all the cops are on Horseback.
  • Car - Literally a car. The Hero will anachronistically drive a car, as he is a rebel and out of his time. It will be an exact replica of the playing piece, lending to it's antique quality compared to the hover vehicles, and allowing the Hero to get away from the horseback cops with ease.
  • Train - Literally a train, but probably an urban E or a subway. Perhaps the climatic showdown or ransom handover occurs here.
  • Thimble - The female lead. She is the daughter of a famous politician, but has eschewed that life, and hasn't spoken to him for years, despite his attempts to find her. He needs to find her for some nefarious reason though, and has hired a corrupt detective to search for her, leading to chase scenes. She has been hiding out as a seamstress in a sweatshop. Amy Adams gets to play something gritty for a change.
  • Cannon - The hero. His gun will TRY to resemble the game piece. Leo DiCaprio.
  • Old style shoe - The dirty detective that is chasing the female lead for the politician, but he kidnaps her and holds her for ransom. Russel Crowe gets to play a bad guy again, since he was so awesome as Sid6, and Scott loves him.
  • Scottie dog - Either the females sidekick that gets killed early on(Named "Scottie" of course), or literally a dog, the Hero's. Sara Rue.
  • Iron - The Good cop that originally is chasing the hero, until he realizes he's the hero(near the end of the film, of course). He wears immaculately tailored and pressed suits and shirts, which will be a running gag and source of mocking for the hero. Ben Affleck.
  • Top hat - The Female leads father, a politician. The first time he is seen, he will be wearing a Top Hat. An interesting bad guy turn for George Clooney or Brad Pitt.


Lionel Braithwaite said...

Where did you get the snobby and over-opinionated idea about the movie in the first place? Maybe the movie will be like the adaptation of Clue (which turned out to be good!) or the upcoming adaptation of Battleship (totally taking the original game concept in a new direction-I won't reveal anything more than that.) Compared to the critically acclaimed crap that critics love (The Hurt Locker, The King's Speech, The Social Network, I'd rather watch Monopoly or Battleship and enjoy myself than watch what people like yourself consider 'great cinema'.

brokenengine said...

A) this was from approx 3 years ago; Battleship hadn't even been developed yet. And it sounds stupid too.
B) the first half(more) of this post is an article written by someone else, hence the quotes. Clearly, you need to read more, as all I said about it is I think it's stupid and ridiculous.
C) you think that this and Battleship sound like great ideas, but you think The Kings Speech and The Social Network are sub-par? Wow.

brokenengine said...

As a fellow foot fetishist, I do like your blog though ;)

Unknown said...


A) this was from approx 3 years ago; Battleship hadn't even been developed yet. And it sounds stupid too.
B) the first half(more) of this post is an article written by someone else, hence the quotes. Clearly, you need to read more, as all I said about it is I think it's stupid and ridiculous.""
Guitar Parts Free Shipping in Canada